Evaluation #7 (Dasha)
№
|
Very effective
(10, 9, 8)
|
Average
(7, 6, 5)
|
Not effective
(4, 3,2, 1)
|
Max points
|
My points
|
|
I.
|
Introduction
|
10
|
8
|
|||
What technique(s) was used
in the introduction?
|
Asking a
question+ telling a story– the speaker encouraged us to think about the
power of voice and shared her personal story, which gave us her idea of a
good speaker. Unfortunately, I found this story not emotional or informative
enough.
|
|||||
Any link-element?
|
The link-element is presented in the text and it makes the transition
to the thesis smooth.
|
|||||
Was the thesis statement
given?
|
«So it’s a great opportunity to avoid the poor delivery of the speech,
just use the features of the voice in the right way.»
|
|||||
How effective was the introduction?
|
The introduction was quite effective..
|
|||||
II.
|
Body
|
10
|
8
|
|||
How well structured was the
information presented?
|
The information
was organized and structured. However, some parts were significantly smaller.
|
|||||
What organizational
structure was used in the body of the speech?
|
The speaker used frequent
signposts, which made it easier to follow.
|
|||||
How understandable was the
information (was it clearly explained)?
|
The information
was clear and concise.
|
|||||
Quality of point-support
(appropriateness, completeness, variety)
|
The speaker used
examples and a helpful presentation to support the topic.
|
|||||
Use of facts, illustrations,
examples, stories.
|
||||||
Was it coherent?
|
Yes, it was coherent and logical.
|
|||||
III.
|
Conclusion
|
10
|
7
|
|||
What technique(s) was used
in the conclusion?
|
I believe the
first part of the conclusion leads to something else. But then the speaker
reminded us the general idea of the speech and summarized the information.
|
|||||
Were all the steps followed
(summary, action, emotional appeal?)
|
Yes.
|
|||||
How effective was the
conclusion?
|
It was average.
|
|||||
Total points
|
30
|
23
|
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий