Evaluation #6(Katya)

№		Very effective (10, 9, 8)	Average (7, 6, 5)	Not effective  (4, 3,2, 1)	Max points	My points
I.	Introduction				10	9
	What technique(s) was used in the introduction?	Asking a question– the speaker asked us what an unprepared speech looks like. Moreover, due to the unusual presentation, introduction was humorous and quite startling, because we did not expect to see a sketch.
	Any link-element?	The link-element is presented in the text and it makes the transition to the thesis smooth and logical.
	Was the thesis statement given?	«With careful planning and an eye for detail, you can write a speech that will inform, persuade, motivate, or entertain»
	How effective was the introduction?	The introduction was quite effective.
II.	Body				10	9
	How well structured was the information presented?	The information was organized and structured.
	What organizational structure was used in the body of the speech?	The speaker outlined each part of her speech and it was easy to follow.
	How understandable was the information (was it clearly explained)?	The information was clear and concise.
	Quality of point-support (appropriateness, completeness, variety)	The speaker used examples and a helpful presentation to support the topic.
	Use of facts, illustrations, examples, stories.
	Was it coherent?	Yes, it was coherent and logical.
III.	Conclusion				10	8
	What technique(s) was used in the conclusion?	The speaker summarized the major points of her speech.
	Were all the steps followed (summary, action, emotional appeal?)	Yes, all the steps were followed.
	How effective was the conclusion?	It was quite effective.
	Total points				30	26